Guest Update 17 April 06
The Different Domains of Innovation
This week’s update was written by
Tom Davenport, who is the Director of Research at Babson Executive
Education and the holder of the President’s Chair in Information
Technology and Management at Babson College. His most recent book is
called Thinking for a Living, published by HBS Press in September
2005.
Innovation is
back in style. Many companies that had been cautious over the past
several years and primarily focused on cost reductions are now turning
their focus to innovation. There is ample evidence of this orientation.
For example, 87% of senior executives in a 2005 survey said that
generating organic growth through innovation is necessary for success in
their industries, and 74% planned to increase spending on innovation in
2005.
Yet the mere
desire for more innovation won't make it happen, and many organizations
have poorly-managed approaches to innovation. In particular, they have
too narrow a focus on innovation, and address only the product
innovation domain. They do not manage an innovation portfolio in terms
of how they source, fund, monitor, and assign responsibility for
innovation. As a result, they will continue to have weak innovation
results. In the 2005 study mentioned above, only 49% of the surveyed
executives were satisfied with the financial returns on investments in
innovation. In another 2005 analysis, undertaken by consultants Booz
Allen and Hamilton, there was no correlation between spending on
innovation and the overall financial performance of organizations.
In order to
construct and manage an innovation portfolio, an organization must
identify the types of innovation that are important to it, the key steps
in the innovation process, and the primary responsibilities for managing
it. Then it can begin to create a more formal approach for managing a
broader, more comprehensive innovation portfolio. I'll describe each of
the elements of such a portfolio.
Types
of Innovation
What are the possible types of innovation that
organizations can and should pursue? Unfortunately, most organizations
focus only upon product innovation. In a 2003 study of companies'
innovation sourcing strategies, two other researchers and I discovered
that product innovation was far more likely to be addressed than any
other type. 70% of the executives surveyed in the study said their
organizations pursued product innovation, whereas the next most common
responses (service and process innovation) were being pursued by only
20% of respondents.

Src: Linder, Jarvenpaa, Davenport,
2003
Types of Innovation Pursued by
Companies
Product
innovation
is certainly important, and in some ways it offers the clearest economic
payoff for innovation. Companies create products, take them to market,
and sell them to customers. Yet there are important arguments for going
beyond product innovation alone. First of all, an increasing proportion
of sophisticated economies are based on services—over 70% in the United
States, for example. Secondly, even in product markets,
customers often buy products not just on the basis of the product's
characteristics, but on the business model and processes by which the
product is sold, and the services offered after the sale. Finally,
companies are much more likely to produce effective and economically
valuable products and services if they have innovative and high-quality
management approaches.
IBM illustrates
both the predominance of product innovation, and the emerging rise of
other innovation domains. For several decades the company has vigorously
pursued product and component research at its corporate laboratories
such as Watson and Almaden. Despite the fact that half of its revenues
derive from services, only in the last year has the company officially
recognized services innovation as part of its innovation portfolio,
creating the Services Research group at its Almaden Labs.
What does
service innovation mean? For companies such as IBM
offering business services, it means the development and testing of new
ways to deliver services such as e-commerce, and new ways to help
organizations change their cultures and processes. For organizations
such as Bank of America that serve consumers, service innovation can
mean identifying and testing new approaches to serve customers at the
branch or point of sale. For a company that performs detailed building
services such as ServiceMaster, service innovation might take the form
of industrial engineering-like attempts to streamline movements and
reduce wear and tear on workers and equipment. Of course, just as
product innovation takes a somewhat different form in each company, so
will service innovation.
Organizations
are increasingly prospering from a combination of product and service
innovation. Apple's iPod, for example, would not have been nearly as
successful without the availability of the iTunes content downloading
service. When IT companies such as IBM and Hewlett-Packard announce new
products, there is often a need for services to install, implement,
maintain, or extract value from them.
Process
innovation
can take place in product or service firms. It usually involves either
internal business processes, or those involved in delivering products
and services to customers. Process innovation can involve revolutionary
or breakthough improvement in broad, cross-functional processes
(sometimes called business process reengineering), or can also entail continuous or one-time
improvement in smaller processes, as in Total Quality Management or Six
Sigma initiatives. Some companies focus their process innovation efforts
in some areas more than others. Dell Computer, for example, is more
oriented to manufacturing and supply chain processes than to any other
type. Others, such as Raytheon, have a broad corporate program that
addresses all processes with one approach (Six Sigma in Raytheon’s
case). Most organizations should have a portfolio of process innovation
initiatives underway at any given time, including both breakthrough and
incremental innovations where necessary.
Managerial
innovation
involves the exploration and adoption of new approaches for managing
people, technology, and other strategic business resources. There have
been hundreds of new management ideas over the past several decades, yet
most organizations are woefully haphazard or faddish in how they adopt
and embrace particular ideas. Just as product innovation usually
involves researchers and engineers, and process improvement has
specialists such as Six Sigma "black belts," managerial innovation is
usually driven by a type of individual called an "idea
practitioner"—someone who identifies appropriate new management ideas
and shepherds them through implementation.
Business model
innovation
may be the least well known of all the innovation domains. Business
models are an organization's fundamental logic for going to market and
making money. Business model innovation is critical because it is
directly tied to an organization's economic fortunes. The concept became
popular at the height of the e-commerce explosion, when many companies
explored online business models for the first time. But e-commerce isn't
the only form of business model innovation that companies can explore.
Any company offering an expensive product for sale, for example, could
explore the possibility of selling the same capability as an on-demand
service (as many computer firms, including IBM and Hewlett-Packard) are
currently doing.
Clearly there
are other potential innovation types in addition to these, such as store
design, architectural, and packaging innovation. Not all of these will
be appropriate for all organizations at all times. Clearly some forms of
innovation are going to be more important to a particular firm than
others. However, a broad portfolio of innovation domains is desirable.
More
Information:
1.
The
Boston
Consulting Group study is called "Innovation
2005."
2.
The Booz Allen study is from
Barry Jaruzelski et al,
"Money Isn't Everything," Strategy + Business 41, Winter 2005, p.
57.
3.
The source for the 70% of services statistic is:
James Brian Quinn,
Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service-Based Paradigm for
Industry. (Free Press, 1992).
4.
For more on Bank of America’s approaches to innovation, see
Stefan Thomke, "R&D
Comes to Services: Bank of America's Pathbreaking Experiments,"
Harvard Business Review, April 2003.
5.
On
process innovation, see Thomas H. Davenport,
Process Innovation: Rengineering Work though Information Technology
(Harvard Business School Press, 1993).
6.
For more on idea practitioners, see Thomas H. Davenport and Lawrence
Prusak,
What's the Big Idea? Creating and Capitalizing on the Best
Management Thinking (Harvard Business School Press, 2003).
7.
Click
here if you have questions or
comments for Tom Davenport.