Search the IBA site

Chronological Listing of Updates

Home
Up

Brazil’s success with Ethanol

16 January 06

 

            The cars below have (at least) two things in common:

 

 

 

Ford Model T 1914

Ford EcoSport 2005

 

 

First, both come from the Ford Motor Company, although almost 100 years apart.  Second, both were designed to run on ethanol, a bio-fuel derived from starches like corn or sugar.   The Model T was eventually re-designed to run on gasoline, which was, at the time, much less expensive than ethanol. 

 

But times change.  In Brazil, ethanol is now about 20 percent less expensive than gasoline.  The Ford EcoSport, available in Brazil and other Latin American countries, is a “flex-fuel” vehicle – it can run on gas or ethanol.   

 

 

Relative prices of Gasoline and Ethanol in Brazil

 (dollars per gigajoule)

reprinted courtesy of The Wall Street Journal

 

Seven of every ten new cars sold in Brazil are flex-fuel.  Most drivers in Brazil like the flexibility of “hedging at the pump,” mixing fuels depending on prices.  They prefer cars that give them a choice. 

 

Ethanol is one of the major reasons that Brazil expects to become energy independent in 2006.  The country’s use of gasoline has actually declined since the late 1970s. 

 

The ability of the Brazilian economy to use ethanol has been developed over the course of more than three decades.  According to a recent article in The Wall Street Journal, the oil shock of 1973 convinced Brazilian policymakers that the country needed to invest in alternatives to petroleum.  Brazil embarked on a variety of industrial policies that developed the bio-fuel industry, and then weaned it from the huge subsidies that the government had used to get it started. 

 

Brazil derives its ethanol from sugar cane.  After decades of government support, Brazil’s sugar industry is now self-sufficient.  By 2010, Brazil expects to export over a billion dollars of ethanol to countries like Japan and Sweden.  Ethanol produces less carbon dioxide than fossil fuels, so these countries want to use it instead of petroleum to meet the emission-reduction provisions of the Kyoto Protocol.

 

The story of Brazil’s energy odyssey illustrates some of the common stages that radical innovations go through, often moving from early success in the lab through many failures in implementation.  When successful, these radical innovations can transform industries and societies.

 

Brazil’s energy ministries now handle a string of visitors from many countries, such as China, India, and the US.  All these countries have a petroleum-dependent energy policy and would like to develop other sources.

 

“It's always struck me as odd that [the United States] hasn't put far more resources into research on alternative energy … It almost offends my pride as a U.S. scientist that we've fallen down so badly in this competition.”

 

MIT Professor Kerry Emmanuel, in an interview in The New York Times, 10 Jan 06

 

Sometimes there’s a big advantage in being a follower.  Brazil has demonstrated some viable alternatives to a petroleum-based future.  In the US, the recent Energy Bill passed by Congress calls for more than doubling ethanol use by 2012. 

 

The US starts from a very low base, however.  According to The New York Times, of the more than 180,000 gas stations in the US, only 460 sell E-85, a gasoline-ethanol mix containing 85% ethanol. 

 

Still, when oil prices go up, drivers will switch to ethanol if they can.  Brazil’s experience shows that ethanol is a feasible alternative to gasoline.  Brazil created the industry over three decades with aggressive government policies.  The next five years will tell us whether the US can create its own ethanol industry with a lighter governmental hand.

 

More information:

 

1.  Ford’s website on ethanol vehicles is here

2.  The Wall Street Journal article from 9 Jan 06 on Brazil and Ethanol is here.

3.  For more on US Sugar Subsidies, here’s a complaint from a public interest group.   

4.  My previous update on E-85 ethanol in the US is here.

5.  The New York Times interview with MIT Prof Kerry Emmanuel is here

 

 

Comments:

From Glenn Klink:

 

well, it cost me $40 to fill the tank this morning, so consumers are feeling the pain.
 
amazingly, there are no E-85 refueling stations in New England as per the US Dept of Energy.  Nor do any of the New England governors belong to the Governors' Ethanol Coalition.
 
i wonder what it would take to get one local station and enough local Ethanol cars on the road to support it? 
 
there may be a reason for this, i am unsure.
 
that said, this country should have a policy and a plan to be energy self-sufficient.
 
ever read the book: winning the oil end game?
 
 
txs.
 
glenn

 

From Richard Weddle:

Don't you think MIT Professor Kerry Emmanuel should
take econ 101 to get up to speed with why we don't put
much into ethanol?

 

 

Creative Commons License

All content on this site licensed under a Creative Commons License.